Sunday, 17 October 2010

In Praise of: Beer & Skittles

Though not an optimist in the absurd sense of maintaining that life is all beer and skittles, he did really seem to maintain that beer and skittles are the most serious part of it. "What is more immortal," he would cry, "than love and war? Type of all desire and joy - beer. Type of all battle and conquest - skittles."
(Manalive by G.K. Chesterton) 

Never mind the beer. (Never mind the beer?!? *looks plaintive*) No, never mind the beer. But the skittles. The skittles warrent our consideration.


I had a conversation with my mother this afternoon. About social networking. My argument was that I would welcome my transhumanist future if it would be that I could wander out into the outside world, social-networking-interface portably tucked under an aesthetically-pleasingly-designed metallic door of some sort implanted in my arm (I know: the alternative is called a laptop. Anyone like to buy me one? *note poet-in-garret-jaded-bitterness-here*), rather than kneeling, acolyte-like, before my makeshift "desk" (read chest of drawers). Her argument was that, in offices across the country, workers would be twitching, bleeping, button-pressing mad marionettes, not getting any work done, and that, on roads  across the country, drivers would, focusing on their integrated screens, smash innto each other with wanton imperviousness(one might almost say glee). (I was going to retort with the prospect of the driverless car, but I forgot.) This vision of the apocolypse amused me, but struck me as faintly (or more than faintly) ridiculous. Firstly, people are not lemmings (generally). They tend not to continue doing things which cause (draatic and obvious) chaos and loss of life indefinately. They tend to take note, and make any neccesary changes, and Keep Calm and Carry On (after any initial Human All Too Human fuss). Secondly, if these (somewhat communist-Russia-reminiscent) "workers" want to bleep and twitch and button-press, why shouldn't they? Their work is evidently not being sufficiently interestinng. It should pull its socks up, or be superceded by social networking. (My mother said that I could only say that becuase I was myself "unproductive". I said that unthinking productivity was a Modernist onwardmarch towards the Motropolisesque gaping jaws of Baal. Politics, politics, politics. Stalks my conversations like a predatory elephant.)

Later, I found myself singing this to myself (mockplaintively). (It is my default selfpitying song - and I have a cold, amongst other things, hence it.)


"This game is not a good game." Having a cold is not a good game. One loses horribly and continually for a few days (however surely one's eventual victory, conquest, skittle, is assured...) *restrains self from tangenting about a -further - conversation on The Sensibleness of Phobias Concerning Inevitable Evils, neccesary weevils, copyright A&S-you-know-who-you-are..*


Then I thought, actually, games are really rather useful. They are training for the inevitable banal attacks of the-antagonistic-things-of-this-world on oneself. (Paranoia? No. I am currently being attacked by hundreds? millions? billions? of minor lifeforms who have paraded delightedly into my nose without so much as a by-your-leave and set up camp there, sleepless and mindlessly mauling me. I have been invaded.) One also finds oneself occasionally beset by the higher lifeforms (inevitably, however nice one is to them). Dogs bark, bees sting, Aunts Aren't Gentlemen. Rape murder and pillage may be exceptions rather than rules, but the minor annoyances of wordbullets, ill-clad-shoulder-jostle-ing and objectionableoddness persist undefeated. So. One takes stock of one's inventory, one nervously peruses the subconscious meter labelled "lives" and one dodges the fired pixels, jumps over the absurd hurdles (such as those placed in the way of the bemused pedestrian in the carpark of the train station in Penzance and one hurrahs joyously at the sucessful completion of every level (Happy Birthday! Congratulations! Nothing Killed You!). 






Then there were The Sims. These dollshousedwellers (Ibsenishly?) have given one the oppurtunity to live more lives than one (and "he who lives more lives than one more lives than one must [may?] die"). For our lives, as Shakespeare may have said (he ought to have done) are prisons from which there is no escape except the escape that can't be escaped *see nonexistant tangent*). We can squander lives that are not our own. (Of course, we may squander our own, if we want to... It's our party and we'll cry if we want to... But we may not want. We may want to do other things with them.)

"I want to waste it playing. Spend all our days in a dream."
(Goldfrapp)

Row row row your boat...  *collapses into the absurdity of it all*



Tuesday, 8 June 2010

AN HOUR OF SEMIAUTOMATIC WRITING - OR - SEMANTICS, PERSONAL APOCALYPSES AND THE ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY (OR OTHERWISE) OF BLOOD

The is always the first word, isn’t it. The first word to enter the consciousness when the tips of the fingers, poised like a pianists, brush, ever so lightly, across the tops of the gray old clunky keys of the halfdecadeold computer’s keyboard. The preposition is a proposition, a suggestion that something should be typed. That something should be typed about. Of course there is never any warning about what WILL be typed about – and sometimes there should be. And sometimes there shouldn’t be. And sometimes there should be simply because it has decided to be unbearably, consciousness-defying dull. So that the head slips onto the coffetable on which the decadeoldcomputer is perched and ever so softly and imperceptibly through the glass, cutting slowly through the eyes, until only the interior of the mind, of the skull that is, of the brain itself, is left, unglassed, within the box, bnever ever to be outside the box, encased and imprisoned and thinking while the blood ebbs slowly away. For the man in the bath will be luxuriating there for some time, so he says, an explorer of the regions of froth and foam, bath and coffe, and sinking into the warmth of it away from the too-natural warmth of the thundering air. And so she slips through the no longer illuminated glass – has, indeed, slipped. And what to think while she is there, dying, knowing that she is dying, and wishing she had consumed that last cup of coffee a little quicker, allowing its caffeine to rush into her brain, the caffienechemicals fizzling along the slumbering synapses – synapses, that is a word she will miss – so that she would not now be dying – thus. However. With that last hour. What will she think? The possibilities stagnate her even more than she is already stagnated in the increasingly congealing little pool of her own blood. Well, let me bleed – less blood, less blood to the brain, less blood to the brain, less thought, less choices, less choices, less wastage of time, in this overgrown jungle of dyspraxicbrain, stormed like athe doodle of a child with a biro on a magnolia coloured wall. She imagines herself typing. She imagines the quickness of the fingers she will never see again. Lasments the loss of movement. Wonders if this loss of movement will be lamented when fingers become pointless things we lose like fins, things superceded by directly-connnected computerisation, heads in vats, like hers, but not, hopefully, bleeding quite so much. She stifles a laugh. It hurts. The movement and the idea. Physically and emotionally. Can anything hurt intellectually. Probably not. The realm of the intellectual is an inviolate mountain peopled by Greek gods and autists (who after all transcend quite a couple of the ordinary human weaknesses).As do flautists. Such as lack of breath. Lack of breath being a thing she had gasped at often and humiliatingly. Like someone by Jane Austin. Blushing, gasping, fainting fool. The future was what she was losing. Not the past – that (sometimes unfortunately) is not something that can be lost. Not the present, any more than people are always losing the present. The future. The thing we are stretching our arms out to, or recoiling from, but ignoring (like Super Mario on a moving screen) at our peril. She wondered, listening to the radio drifting in from the kitchen, how much of what people claim to think and to feel is posturing. Whether, actually, she was just as clever as the people on the radio – only didn’t frame it in the same frames. She wondered if that had to do with class. The endless question of class. The distasteful question of class. Something inescapable given the past but unthinkable given the present, unless one wishes to find oneself bloodsmattered on a barricade. Of course, if was a little late for the flinging of oneself onto barricades. Considering she had already flung herself through a computerscreen. Stories of love as though most people really love other people. Anyhow she had been happy. She would no longer be happy and… She could not think of that and if she did she would cry and she would be electrocuted, her head being, as it was, in an electrical appliance. The awfulness of people, hundreds of years ago, not being able to see each other because of the awfulness of society. The awfulness of anyone allowing that to happen when society no longer has that power, in any concrete sense. Concreate sense? Perhaps it never did. But it is only now, perhaps, that anyone realises that, can imagine that, things only becoming imagineable when they are on the verge of being possible. Someone spoke of a composer who, as a woman, “bore comparison” with those of her contemporaries who were compsers and men. The horrificness of this made her heart pump a little harder once. To think that this could possibly be thought to make a difference is awful. To die away from a world like that might not be so bad… So bad as what? The delicacies of language run away from time. The blackness in there, the blackness in the fatal square of plastic, was the last thing she would ever see. A series of pictures marched past, tableux after tableaux, possessions – because, that is the thing, isn’t it, that the thing we really possess, more perhaps than ever the body, is the mind. It is a truism, but a true one. A true truism. A truetruism. The wave, like something by Rapheal (was it really Raphael? She wasn’t sure) or his hair. Like an angel, anyway, one of those beautiful pouting angels people paint. The strange difficultness of jazz, weaving in and out of patterns, never really coming to rest anywhere unless the ear zooms out, like the eye can. That word again. The. She would never be married now. She wasn’t sure if that was good or not. “A lot of people get married without wishing to at the time.” How awful! To imagine running away, screaming, wishing one had not weaved oneself in to a spiderweb. The awfulness of the confusion of marriage and reproduction. The sickening awfulness at the base of the subject. Of, indeed, the stomach. Which is, presumably, the subject. The container. The idiocy of the idea of having children and then not wanting to do anything for them. WHY NOT JUST NOT HAVE CHILDREN? That came out in capitals. As, I suppose, children do. Death would save her from that. Though death might be a step too far away from reproduction. How about balancing out the scales between addonehumanbeing and subtractonehumanbeing. “It’s finding the magic in the day-to-day.” Yes. Perhaps. Feeling wrong thinking about that – when dying, particularly. The awfulness of the cynicism. The thumbsup. The fakesmile. The awfulness. The vortex of the inane. Why make statements? “We live in a witness culture.” How horrible. The darkness was delightful. The envelopingness of the darkness. Wrapped in unseeableness. Although, of course, the rest of her was visible. Would have been visible. Had anyone been there. Of course – they might have been. But had they been they would have been watching her bleeding to death. Which would have been rather horrible of them, surely? No more coffee. No more, indeed, anything. Apart from, perhaps, Nothingness with a Capital N. Drifting bodylessly through Space – “Out of SPACE, Out of TIME”, Poe knowing everything, of course, and going mad because of it (or too sane, far too sane for comfort, comfort being a Pragmatism of the highest order – or possibly not, not too sane for comfort, too insane for comfort – how can one possibly know until one is floating through the Nothingness or not). Or a flickingthrough of radiostations. Zooming along airways. Not like White Noise one hopes. No point in wondering, really. You’ll find out soon enough. OR NOT. If the notfindingout is the findingout. The idea of politicians teasing each other. The extreme silliness of it all. The extreme silliness out of which she was drifting into what one could only assume would be a drifting towards the solemnity of the deathmoment (to go all German linguistically). One is only the outer tip of a pencil, pressed onto the paper of time, gotten out of the way for the next lot. One has to stay legible. One has to avoid delirium, dementia, unconsciousness for very much more than 8 hours… But all that is over, or will be, soon… The darkness was thickening, Drifting in through the nostrils like treacle (if ever she had experienced treacle drifting into her nostrils – which is unlikely). Through the mouth. Pushing out the air. Pushing out the blood. All very grisly. DEATH speaks in CAPITALS – certain writers know that. So the darkness pushed its way in, a last violation it would be written were this a vampire story, but it is neither a vampire nor a story nor a vampire story, so it won’t be hereafter, erotic as the image of a woman bleeding to death with her head thrust through a computerscreen is no doubt to the vast majority of you (no?) – it filled her lungs and the air didn’t. And so she died. THE END.

Thursday, 14 January 2010

Insomnia



Tonight Tonight Times New Roman will be the lucky font to convey The Thoughts of Carrie Gooding (IN CAPITALS). Because ... the cause being ... newspapers are all about time/Time are they not? The only picture on the cover should be the chap with the hourglass ... considering of course the sudden rush to the shop to buy The Thing/The Time/The Times/The Guardian before the day is done. Saving the day! Saving time! Like a person in a cartoon flicking from picture to picture and the past pictures burning into indeterminate blackness as they fall through the seive of the memory/of my memory/for your memory may not be a sieve...

...things fall out of the net of Time ... those words so carefully aligned to those times in those diaries ... they hide in the nebulosity of the ink-blot of information, and then they are behind rather than in front of the YOU ARE HERE on the time-line ... it is mischievous of them ... they must be hunted like snarks with railway shares, with railway timetables, with little lists ... the dot dot dots are tick tock ticks ... they are footsteps down 

I am "drifting into the arena of the unwell". It is so often "four in the morning". I am so often playing that, very quietly, very badly, on my boyfriend's Spanish guitar, at "four in the morning". For that is when my mind runs like a newly-bought T-shirt - onto everything else, turning my life an Aesthetic and highly impractical shade of pink ... like a ketamine-lobster ... ever turning the corner like Sartre's ... The Pierrot of the Minute is evading me. "Here comes a candle to light you to bed! Here comes a chopper to chop off your head!" "Utopia... Utopia..." Insomnia... Insomnia... This is Plato's transcendent and static realm and the crackling of the static/stasis is deafening me. Hands over ears! Hands over eyes! Hands over mouth!





(Illustration: by Gustave Dore for Edgar Allan Poe's poem 'The Raven')

I wake at 5PM. I think until 9AM. I sleep until 5PM. I wake at 5PM. I think until 9AM. I sleep until 5PM. I am stuck on a carousel and it is accelerating ... if I jump off it will be as though I jumped from a train ... and the chuggachuggachugga chuggachuggachugga of my thoughts is running away until I look at them from a dazed distance and dive into the ink of the sky while the stars sear into my pinkening reddening eyes ... the owls ... the owls of Gormenghast are becoming and consuming me at once.

Witless of how his death by owls approaches he mourns through each languid gesture, each fine-boned feature, as though his body were glass and at its centre his inverted heart like a pendant tear.


HEROD
 . . . wherefore do I hear in the air this beating of wings? Ah! one might fancy a huge black bird that hovers over the terrace. Why can I not see it, this bird? The beat of its wings is terrible. The breath of the wind of its wings is terrible. It is a chill wind. Nay, but it is not cold, it is hot. I am choking. Pour water on my hands. Give me snow to eat. Loosen my mantle. Quick! quick! loosen my mantle. Nay, but leave it. It is my garland that hurts me, my garland of roses. The flowers are like fire. They have burned my forehead. (He tears the wreath from his head, and throws it on the table.)

They are not long, the days of wine and roses:
Out of a misty dream
Our path emerges for a while, then closes
Within a dream.

The inevitable realignment to The Time of the Masses stands in from of me and points at its watch ... I will have to dive into it and lose myself ... a sketch of a person into the ink of the crowd ... but for now I stand differentiated, one of the strange few who wander 24-hour shops in search of sustainance forgotten and a rememberment that Humanity endures.






Friday, 4 December 2009

Q: Why Should I Keep A Diary? A: Why I Should Keep A Diary.

Repeatedly I have suggested to myself that it might be a good idea to keep a diary - perhaps because I have hoped that were I to keep a diary I might feel constrained to do something with my life. Well - of course I am doing something with my life. I am squandering my life. There really is no point being tactful about it. There is never any point being tactful to oneself. Books - books make the world go round. Books record that the world goes round. Without books we might not be at all sure about the matter... Without books I am not at all sure that I ... do anything at all. But - I have tried. I have begun diaries. With the most laudable of intentions. And I have forgotten all about them. Also - I am 22. I would much rather begin a diary at the beginning of a decade. And - it is December the fourth. And I would much rather begin a diary at the beginning of a month or a year. 22 years of lost life. 22 years of blank pages. This is what eternity looks like in miniature. And it is existential angst. And it is The Scream. So This little bit of non-diary will be an attempt to convince myself to keep a diary. It is a telling-off - and an attempt at self-redemption.

'Schools or parents may teach or require children to keep diaries in order to encourage the expression of feelings and to promote thought.' (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diary). Without diaries (of some sort), I'm not sure we actually HAVE thoughts - all becomes inchoate. Without having to express anything to anyone ever (yes that is my without-a-diary experience - my out-of-literature experience) one simply doesn't convert one's experience into a narrative form. This may be closer to a sort of mystical-Evelyn-Underhill-esque truth than the (unbearable) narrative of OTHER PERSON: How was your day? ONESELF: Well I did this and this and this and it meant this and this and this to me and I felt this and this and this... Or as the case may be OTHER PERSON: How was your day? ONESELF: Why on earth do you need to know that? Leave me alone. 

I suppose partly I do not keep a diary because I am afraid that it will highlight the monotony of my life. MONDAY: Dazedly wandered out of bed around noon. Shouted at someone. Drank coffee. Facebooked. Read a novel. Facebooked some more. Lost consciousness. TUESDAY: Dazedly wandered out of bed around noon. Became entwined in some obscure brawl. Drank coffee. Facebooked. Read a book on how the self is connected to some section of the brain which, is inadvertently removed, annihilates one. Facebooked some more. Lost consciousness. WEDNESDAY: Slept all day like a cat. THURSDAY: Dazedly wandered out of bed. Had minor tantrum. Strode ten miles. Drank coffee. Lost consciousness. FRIDAY: Dazedly wandered out of bed. Spent all day on Facebook to make up for Wednesday and Thursday. Lost consciousness. SATURDAY AND SUNDAY: as Monday and Tuesday. What all this lacks, of course, is progression. It is like wandering through a forest dappled with light. It is like Proust's idea of memory. It very much is not like a present melting (or striding) into a future. I am too - laid back. Watching the clouds (and clouds most significantly represent time for me) pass by. Staying almost eternally still. Time-lapse photography would reveal subtle changes - the sorts of expressions which pass by the people in The Picture of Dorian Gray (no - not the hideous and sin-linked aging - though perhaps that too - decadence - decay - sinking into the underworld of sunken ships - neither waving nor drowning but drowned). 

I am also wary of falsifying myself. This may seem terribly terribly precious - but I am, to me. Anyone who isn't precious to themselves ought really to become so or to give up on the whole exercise of existing at all, no? That is what is so dislike about therapy. The self-creation over the self-creation like layers of wallpaper held together by inescapable yellow glue. Being papered over. Suffocating silently. So that in the end only the imprint of a silent open glue-choked mouth remains. Still and undamaging but really quite dead. Analysis - falsification. Who on earth KNOWS what I did. Or why. Or what I thought. Thoughts are games. Moves in games. No more real than that. All that is real is the physical. I am composed of [insert number here] atoms. I am [insert geographical position here]. My name is [insert name here]. God knows about anything else. And God as I picture/visualise/conceptualise it is all possible worlds, all possible possibilities - EVERYTHING - truth. Beyond that the possibilities are endless. Perhaps I put on my shoes because I wanted to feel the sensation of the structure/texture of them on my feet. Perhaps I put on my shoes because I wanted someone to admire them. Perhaps I put on my shoes because someone told me to. Perhaps I put on my shoes because I read an article claiming that the putting-on-of-shoes was good for one's health. Perhaps I put on my shoes because I felt that it was impossible for me not to put on my shoes. Perhaps I put on my shoes because my feet had grown mouths and were going to scream and I needed to hush them because The Society For The Shooting of The People With Screaming Feet were parading past me clothed in purple robes. Perhaps, perhaps, perhaps... Polysynapticorgiasticfantasticscholasticbombasticfatalisticsadisticmoralisticfix. If I am to diarise (rather than 'If I am to die') then let me diarise in the form of a collage book thing of thought. Don't for God sake let me lock myself into a persona. This isn't a play, even if the world is a stage. Or, at least, if it is a play, I really don't want to feel constrained to play one part in any narratively coherent manner. Anyone less involved with me than I am will put all the pieces together anyway. Simply because there will always be some element of Carrieness. Some element of Carrieness I personally probably would not see. Because I am so much with me. Almost always with. Quite possibly never away from me. And that is a dreadful thing, isn't it, never to be away from oneself? Like being endlessly stalked by an identity. Who shall I be today...? Oh. It's me again. Drat. I rather wanted to be Elizabeth the First. Or Oscar Wilde. Or ... Theymondialkle Yhebhe. Whoever on earth or under over or around it they may be. (I remember my grandmother often exclaiming 'And who are you being NOW?' - the answer being, usually, someone I had read and absorbed like a literally vampire/eater-of-souls). And that is what we do when we experience other people's thoughts, surely? We become them, just a little. We consume them. We are what we ... think. Which is possibly why we have such a horror of being subjected to ideas which we find dreadful - and people whose ideas we find dreadful. Quite apart from the pressure of the expectation of not breaking furniture over their heads...

So a book. A book. A book I do not destroy or decide to use for something else or lose or pour coffee over or anything else but diarise and archive somehow. Because really I'd better get on with living. 22 years is a long time. It could be a lot worse, of course. But I've been worrying about the passing of time for around a decade, now, and, surprisingly enough, time hasn't frozen itself for me. And it won't - probably. (I don't entirely rule it out.) But what on earth is the point I can't help but think if I've no-one to show it to? Would a blackbird on its own on a post-apocalyptic earth bother to sing? And of course the whole point to some extent of a diary is that one can write anything at all and I can't exactly write anything at all if other people are going to read and/or look at the thing. Good God no. I would be - lynched. Or - utterly abandoned. Or thought terribly terribly odd. Or terribly terribly unkind. Or terribly terribly indiscreet. Or terribly terribly terribly. No-one would ever be able to tell me anything. But how to keep the thing secret? Where to hide it? To bury it? To wrap it up with chains and padlocks... I would have to have the thing with me to write in it. But OH MY GOD what if anyone read it? It would be ... hideous. And also of course the after-I-am-dead thing. I wouldn't be at all surprised if whatever diary I kept were published after-I-am-dead. (Or, rather, while I am dead - unless I intend to somehow transcend death - and intending to transcend death is all very well...)

Or - are poems enough? Not if I don't write enough poems... And poems should be art more than they are life. Not: I love walking by the sea and eating ice-creams oh and I'm in love again ain't that nice and I like slippers. No - life isn't art unless - it is. 

Thursday, 26 November 2009

Just Another Victim

Just Another Victim is ... a single ... by someone. This interests me insignificantly. The word 'victim' does interest me, though. It is a forceful word. It automatically assigns blame (another one of those morality-laden words) away from the person to whom it is given, and towards some other person. Language is more than just the expression of what is - a lot of the time it is the covert expression of a point-of-view, an angle, a worldview. This is most evident in journalism. Read two different papers about one single event and one might be forgiven for imagining that this one single event were two completely different events. This is obvious, but noteworthy. The most foceful use of this language-forcefulness is in the arena of insults. To call a person some derogatory name is to label that person - to (if one is going to take language literally - which is, I think, the idea) metamorphose that person into whatever one has labelled them as. 'You terrible cur!' one exclaims (or doesn't, if one is inhabiting the 21st Century), dehumanising one's language-brawl-opponant. And, if they refrain from reciprocally magicking one into something else, that they remain - while one sneers down at them from one's lofty pinnacle of humanity. Of course, this sort of insult could (in literal terms - and do let's be literal) could be interpreted simply as an error. 'You terrible cur!' one exclaims. 'Are you quite sure? Perhaps it's the light...' the cur replies, smugly safe in the knowledge that within the realm of the literal theur assailant is simply mistaken or mad. Of course, such literalism is generally considered to be mistaken or mad in itself... Unfortunately, alternatives along the lines of 'I really don't like you at all, you know...' lack punch. 'I hate you!' sounds simply childish, unless whispered beneath floods of tears while wearing a very beautiful dress and tear-smudged mascara in moonlight... And even then... Language is, as Wittgenstein was well aware, terribly terribly flawed. And yet (she typed, dramatically) - what else is there? Language is what we throw at each other when we want to get across the abyss between us - The Problem of Others. Unfortunately it all gets lost in trabslation from brain to brain until all it really sounds like is a screamed request PLEASE LIKE ME or PLEASE LEAVE ME ALONE or all of the suchlike variations on those themes, sometimes, perhaps, a little blurred into each other. I don't imagine for a moment that anyone reading any of this will experience it in any way particularly similar to the way in which I am experiencing it. Let's face it - we are all UTTERLY alone. And we must, each of us, get used to it. If this sounds bleak, it isn't meant to - I adore people, particularly some particular people - of course I do. What I mean is - we can only experience each other up to a point. Beyond that is simple (and rather sweet) delusion. Words words words. Like looking at paintings through dark glasses, through a glass darkly... These are tools blunted at the edges with being thrown at people and blunted. As soon, of course, as one says any of this, it sounds rather - intense. Much better to use the correct tags for the correct things and pretend that everything is perfectly perfectly clear ... no? That is pragmatic, certainly - but it certainly isn't true - and truth is beauty, and all that. That is why, perhaps, we want preciseness. The preciseness of non-stage poetry and suchlike. Becuase we really do want to jump across that abyss, even if it is neccesarily suicide to do so, even if it is neccesarily impossible. Which is rather sweet of us, don't you think?

Tuesday, 24 November 2009

Pariscope

Pariscope is, it seems, a Paris weekly focusing on events ... events ... what exactly is an event? A phenomenon: "an observable occurrence". The more observable the occurrence, the more of an event an event is. Thus the sparkling of cameras - to catch the light that shines on it. Thus the interviewing of athletes - to catch the last  gasped inhalations and exhalations of their exertion. Thus the ink-emanations of birthdays in The Times. We can be seen, we breath, we live! We are - events. It doesn't really matter that there is - a party, a race, a birthday... What matters is that there are people who are allowed ... allowed ... to jolly well show off for a while. If girls behaved as they do at parties when they were not at parties - they would be thought very silly (and conceited) indeed (sometimes, of course, they are anyway).The party is an excuse. In a supermarket, purchasing, say, chocolate biscuits ... to dance (there is often music, of a sort, in supermarkets...) and flounce and giggle would be deemed ... rather odd. Add enthusiastic photography to the above and it becomes ... odder  - it would be assumed that one were on one's way to a party (and being not-entirely-serious), or on one's way home from one (and being not-entirely-serious) - or damned eccentric. We do not, again, tend to interview people who have run for buses... Why not? What they have done is probably far more practically worthwhile than what the athlete, running in circles around a track like a personification of circularity has done. That is the point - it is not l'art pour l'art.  Why not post the words 'I [insert name here] am alive today' or 'I exist'. That, after all, is what a birthday is all about - continuing to exist. One is only allowed to notice the fact one a year: gosh, here I am still... Which seems rather a pity. Because every single second that one exists (yes I know I know - you know you know) is a near-miracle of wonderfulness ... and all that. An event. My inhalation is an event. My exhalation is an event. My every proof of continued existence is an event. My every word is an event. My every pressing-down on my every key of my every laptop is - an event. But this - as perhaps is being illustrated - is prone to become ... repetitive and quite the opposite of the wonderment-expression that it is intended to be. Our minds seem only to be able to cope with concise wonderment - births marriages and deaths ... and all that. This, I suppose, is because we have to concentrate. This, I suppose, is because we have to not exhaust ourselves with sensory input after sensory input being given vast attention. This, I suppose, is because we get used to yo-yo-ing between on and off like switches leveled. We don't want to blow our fuses. But - every day is an event, if you want it to be. The option is there.

Monday, 23 November 2009

Influenza A virus subtype H7N4

This is appropriate ... yesterday I concluded reading In the Wake of the Plague: The Black Death and the World it Made (Norman F. Cantor, 2001, The Free Press), another example of what can only really I suppose be considered my absolute obsession with The Black Death. Influenza A virus subtype H7N4 is a form of flu affecting birds - primarily, it seems, chickens. So ... do I write about flu or do I write about flu or do I write about chickens?

FLU

Flu is not something I have any personal experience of. It is, however, one of those things one dreads happening to one. Like a grand piano falling on one's head. That sort of thing. (Flu and suchlike originated, so one theory goes, in animals. Bird flu and swine flu and suchlike are no more bestial than flu flu. They just hopped over the divide more recently.) What is most striking, I think, about viruses and suchlike is that, basically, one's body, that supposedly exclusive domain of oneself, has been invaded by a little swarming army of alien CREATURES. The very idea is HORRIBLE. Before magnification the imaginative were nit beset with these nightmares... Water is one of the worst things - yes, I know, OCD. - swarming with LIVING THINGS, as is the air, as is, when something like flu inflicts itself on one, oneself... Until one might as well be peering out from the inside of a mushroom or the amorphous black shape of a swarm of leg-twitchingly-fleet locusts, wings bashing smashing against wings until they might all smash to dust... The very idea is HORRIBLE. Before magnification when one become ill one simply became ill - one did not contain multitudes. I may be significantly less likely to die of flu if I catch it, due to magnification and the resultant understandings of the scientists/pharmacists who will give me medicines ... but I am going to be significantly more repelled by the whole thing. ...you must consider all swarming creatures living in the seas or the streams that have no fins or scales disgusting. This all leads to the consideration of the general excessiveness of life in general. Over the last couple of hundreds of years, our horizons have - broadened rather considerably. Geographically the whole world is at our feet/planes/boats/trains etc. Most of us try to forget this most of the time - it is vertiginous. Most of us know that when we stand on our feet we are like tiny insects perched on the hardened convex surface of a glass of water, and that the flatness we perceive is illusory. Most of us try to forget this, pragmatically, most of the time - 'Of course the world is round!' we exclaim, while feeling very grateful that we do not perceive it as such, because, if we did, we would probably fling ourselves to the ground and try to hang onto it, like people on the very edge of a cliff who are no more likely to fall over than if they were not on the very edge of a cliff, but feel that they are so - because it would be vitally more important. Beyond the actual is the virtual - and this includes, to varying extents, all art. Art, though it sometimes may not seem like it, it really excessively abundant. The quality of a lot of it remains to be seen - it is obscured by the rest of it. There are worlds upon worlds we may inhabit (non-physically) if we so wish. Within the next half-hour I could watch a film trailer (say Northfork), read a poem (say The Burden of Itys) and look at a painting (say The Starry Night). Three very different worlds - very disorientating. We are traveling towards omniscience. We are traveling towards being gods looking down on the world from a Mount Olympus or a Nietzschean,  the voluptuous distance and remoteness of the bird, which always flies further aloft in order always to see more under it - this is the opposite of magnification - a zooming-out into infinitude, a dissipation, a fading, and it began surely with the centre of the Big Bang or the expanding universe (even if the universe is not expanding physically, OUR universe, the universe of the mind of experience etc etc etc  is).  A spherical world, closed but continually exapnding, in a new playground for thought. The wider the margins the more notes to the primary texts there can be - and more illustrations...

CHICKENS

Chickens run around with no heads. This is analogous to running around with no thoughts. Which is entirely possibly (believe me). This is the opposite of an expanding universe. This is a universe circling around itself in ever-decreasing circles until it drops dead. This is obsession, this is circularity, this is habit, this is all those things that wrap their tendrils around us and push their thorns into our veins as though we were unwilling saints, thorns pressed into out throbbing temples (in a divine as well as a physical sense). Crowns of thorns are never good ideas. Crowns of thorns are bad ideas repeated and repeated and repeated. Explosion into a mind-map of ideas and projects and suchlike is preferable to introverted circularity.